Skip to main content

Design System Automation With AI

5 min read
Ux Eng

Ux Eng

AI can generate components. You own the system — tokens, patterns, governance.


Design System Automation With AI

TL;DR

  • AI can generate components, variants, and documentation. It can't decide what belongs in the system or enforce coherence.
  • Use AI for repetitive work: scaffolding, docs, migration. You own the strategy and the standards.
  • Design systems are as much about governance as components. AI doesn't govern.

Design systems scale. So does the work to maintain them. New components, variant sprawl, docs that go stale. AI can help with the grind. But a design system is more than a component library — it's a set of decisions about consistency, when to break the rules, and who gets to add what. AI can't make those calls.

What AI Can Do

Component scaffolding:

  • "Generate a Button component with primary, secondary, disabled states." AI can draft. You refine for your tokens and patterns.
  • Saves time. Don't let it set your API. You decide props, variants, and composition.

Documentation:

  • Component docs, usage guidelines, do's and don'ts — AI can draft from your existing docs.
  • Verify examples. AI will invent props or misuse components. Check everything.

Migration and refactoring:

  • "Convert these 50 buttons to use the new design system." AI can suggest changes. You review for edge cases and regressions.
  • Batch operations benefit from AI. Still need a human pass.

Token and theme generation:

  • "Create a dark mode variant from these tokens." AI can propagate. You validate contrast, hierarchy, and brand.
  • Don't auto-apply. Review. Design tokens have semantic meaning. AI might break it.

What AI Can't Do

Scope and governance:

  • What belongs in the system? What's a one-off? When do we create a new component vs. extend an existing one?
  • These are product and design decisions. You make them.

Consistency under ambiguity:

  • Two designs are similar but not identical. Combine or split? AI can't judge your design language.
  • You own the taxonomy. You own the "this is the same component" vs. "this is different" call.

Cross-team alignment:

  • Engineering, design, product — they all use the system. They have conflicting needs. AI doesn't sit in the meeting.
  • You facilitate. You decide. AI assists.

The UX Engineer's Role

  • Define the system. Tokens, components, patterns. AI helps produce; you define.
  • Enforce quality. Linting, a11y, documentation. Automate what you can. AI can help. You set the bar.
  • Evolve intentionally. New components don't just appear. There's a process. You own it.
  • Bridge design and code. Designers think in pixels. Engineers think in components. You translate. AI can draft; you ensure it's right.

Best Practices

  • Single source of truth. Tokens, components, docs — one place. AI can help keep it updated; you maintain the structure.
  • Review every AI addition. No auto-merge. Design system changes have downstream impact. Human gate.
  • Document decisions. "We use X because Y." AI can't write that. You can. Future you will thank present you.

Manual process. Repetitive tasks. Limited scale.

Click "With AI" to see the difference →

Quick Check

What remains human when AI automates more of this role?

Do This Next

  1. Identify one repetitive task — Component docs? Token propagation? Try AI. Measure time saved and errors introduced. Iterate.
  2. Document your governance — Who can add components? What's the review process? Make it explicit. AI doesn't replace process.
  3. Run an audit — Are there components or tokens AI could help clean up? Pick one area. Pilot.